feat: async support for process functions #9
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
oseoin
changed the title
dhelennon
approved these changes
Jun 9, 2025
Co-authored-by: andrey-zelenkov <[email protected]>
oseoin
force-pushed
the
oseoin/process-async
branch
from
93b5719 to
d8b9068
Compare
andrey-zelenkov
approved these changes
Jun 17, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Adds support for running
process_inputandprocess_responseasasync. Have performed performance tests with both options and have not seen any meaningful difference between the two.pyrightseems to be happy with the implementation.Checklist
Before creating a PR, run through this checklist and mark each as complete.